← Search

David McCallum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GRANITE BAY, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 23W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history40 matches
W
2026-05-08 · ROUND HILL CC 40AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Grintsaig championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · ROUND HILL CC 40AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tate Chandler
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · ROUND HILL CC 40AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leif Krauss
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-05-04 · OLYMPIC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Hultman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-03-23 · OLYMPIC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Hultman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-05-25 · OLYMPIC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Buckley
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-02-24 · ROUND HILL CC 40AM4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rob Vassel
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-14 · ROUND HILL CC 40AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elliot Bloom
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-20 · OLYMPIC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Weinstock
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-05-18 · OLYMPIC 55AM9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Allison
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-16 · ROUND HILL CC 40AM5.0+A · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Craig Lazarchik
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-25 · OLYMPIC 55AM9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Allison
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 62.6% of games
5.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.6% of games
9.0
50%
3W–3L · 46.3% of games
9.5
40%
2W–3L · 55.7% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova