← Search

Mark Seamans

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Kmetik
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Clawson
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Rafferty
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
L
2024-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Kubiniec
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-3
W
2024-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Kubiniec
loading the estimate
2-3
L
2024-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stu Silverberg
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stu Silverberg
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Voloch
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Conan Foster
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-08-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Woodrum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-08-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Voloch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-08-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Altman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
8.0
40%
6W–9L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe