← Search

Jean Stivers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pebble Beach, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 13W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CARMEL V RANCH CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy More
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-10-04 · CARMEL V RANCH CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathrin Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · CARMEL V RANCH CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gena Sagin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Tracy championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Tracy championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Tracy
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Tracy
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-04-13 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephanie Scattini
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-26 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jodi Andrews
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-04-28 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Linda Scholink
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-27 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathrin Brown
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-04-20 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hiroko Schroeder
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
50%
10W–10L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal