← Search

Sheryl Flater

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Evergreen, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 1W–10L · seasons 2023–2025
Match history11 matches
L
2025-07-30 · EPR RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tia Heneghan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · EPR RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne McHugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-16 · EPR RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tia Heneghan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-02 · EPR RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tia Heneghan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-31 · EPR GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne McHugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-24 · EPR GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwendolyn Rauch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-07-17 · EPR GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Gardiner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-10 · EPR GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwendolyn Rauch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-26 · EPR GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwendolyn Rauch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-18 · CK RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Ferrin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-11 · CK RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Ferrin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 73% of the time
#3 Doubles
73%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova