← Search

Nancy Bray

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manchester, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 77W–127L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history204 matches
L
2026-10-30 · (B) EHTC:Mixers:Bray/Lachack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Donovan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-25 · GTC:Net Profits:Varley/Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Hill
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · (B) EHTC:Mixers:Bray/Lachack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Donovan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · (A) EHTC:Powershots:Blair/Baran · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ida Zhang
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-09 · (B) EHTC:Mixers:Bray/Lachack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Donovan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · GTC:Net Profits:Varley/Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xia Lu
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-21 · GTC:Net Profits:Varley/Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Varley
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-29 · GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/Moody · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Moody
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/Moody · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Moody
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · (Q) EHTC:Summer Shots:Blair · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawna Baron
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Bray/Moody · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · EHTC:Mixers:Bray/Lachack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clive Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
32.5%
13W–27L · 43.5% of games
4.0
43.2%
19W–25L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
38%
27W–44L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
34.1%
15W–29L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
36 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert