← Search

Edward Lehman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baldwin, NY
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
11 matches · 1W–10L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Carefree, Lindenman/Rothman · #1 Doubles · with Brian McGeough
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-15 · Carefree, Lindenman/Rothman · #2 Doubles · with Nathan Rothman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-22 · Carefree, Lindenman/Rothman · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-30 · Bethpage Park, Thaler/McKean · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roderick Thaler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2021-07-13 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gail Packer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-06-18 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Warren mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-08 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Sawchenko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2021-03-18 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Caldwell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-08-26 · Bethpage Park, McKean · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Goldfarb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2019-08-20 · Bethpage Park, McKean · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Kassel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2019-07-23 · Bethpage Park, McKean · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Kassel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 7.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King