← Search

Laura Saggese

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cos Cob, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 33W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history96 matches
W
2026-09-17 · WTC: 3.5 The Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Rabin
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-5
L
2025-07-02 · MKCC Racquet Runners · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Lombino
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-30 · Armonk Tennis: NY Wonders 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Lombino
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-22 · Armonk Tennis: NY Wonders 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Lombino
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-12 · MKCC Racquet Runners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Lombino
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-05 · MKCC Racquet Runners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigitte Tanner
loading the estimate
0-6
L
2025-06-01 · SOL:Hit and Run:Tanner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Mixer
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-29 · Armonk Tennis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brigitte Tanner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-28 · CP:Women Who Lunch: Barnwell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ondrea Schiciano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-23 · CP:Women Who Lunch: Barnwell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eileen Raleigh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-01 · Armonk Tennis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Mixer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-10 · Armonk Tennis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ondrea Schiciano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 44.3% of games
8.0
30.8%
12W–27L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe