← Search

Larry Barnes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salisbury, NH
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 12W–8L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history20 matches
L
Bradford Brainard / Joe Meyer
2024-07-27 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Cistulli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-20 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Cistulli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-01 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Siegel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-04-20 · ALG:Duckless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Siegel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-10 · ALG:Duckless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Siegel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-10-22 · ALG:AlgonquinAlleyCats:Blaisdell:Bayer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Horan
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-04-02 · ALG:Warriors:Blaisdell · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Prachar Jr
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-03-26 · ALG:Warriors:Blaisdell · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2020-02-29 · ALG:Blaisdell4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Rudd
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2020-02-16 · ALG:Blaisdell4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Kingwill
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2020-01-18 · ALG:Blaisdell4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Day
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
Tim Hanson / Thomas Dennis
2019-10-19 · ALG:McCallum · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Blaisdell
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 54.9% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams