← Search

Marylou Watson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
La Fayette, NY
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
52 matches · 8W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melody Fredrickson championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Sikora
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Cavanagh
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-16 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melody Fredrickson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Anderson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynda Otis
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynda Otis
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-11 · Drumlins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Watson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-20 · Drumlins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Watson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-13 · Drumlins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Watson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-26 · Concilla · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurt Watson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-22 · Concilla · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurt Watson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 38.5% of games
7.0
35%
7W–13L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–13L · 27.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 14.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert