← Search

Ajay Pant

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS, IL
4.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history18 matches
L
2026-07-12 · STL/Bush-Pupillo/40&Over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-07 · Kuberski UNDERDOGS (Winter 25) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-01-17 · Kuberski UNDERDOGS (Winter 25) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-12-15 · Kuberski’s Underdogs (8.0 MXD) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-11-22 · Kuberski’s Underdogs (8.0 MXD) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-11-01 · Kuberski’s Underdogs (8.0 MXD) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-10-11 · Kuberski’s Underdogs (8.0 MXD) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-02-25 · Kuberski 8.0 MXD (Winter 24) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-01-28 · Kuberski 8.0 MXD (Winter 24) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-01-21 · Kuberski 8.0 MXD (Winter 24) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-01-07 · Kuberski 8.0 MXD (Winter 24) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-11-12 · Kuberski 8.0 Mixed - ES 24 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Pant mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.4% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King