← Search

Rob Parker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tavares, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 41W–22L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history63 matches
W
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Taylor
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-06 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Gogola
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Searer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Pickering
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Pickering
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Lee
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Searer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raymond Korson
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 56.7% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.2% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.2% of games
8.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert