← Search

Stephanie Almeida

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Frederick, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
377 matches · 172W–205L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history377 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Bullman - Bullmainia Mixed Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Preslar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-18 · Bullman - Bullmainia Mixed Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jesse Shirley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-24 · Chen - GrandSlammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Jordan
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · Chen - GrandSlammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Jordan
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Team 2 The Perennials · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sol Lopez
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Wells
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa McIntire
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Trimble
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-27 · Hathaway 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Dorsey
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Hathaway 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Shawhan
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Hathaway 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Bolduc
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams112 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.4% of games
4.0
49.7%
80W–81L · 48.6% of games
4.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 38.3% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.3% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.1% of games
8.0
50%
29W–29L · 50.6% of games
8.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.1% of games
9.0
50%
4W–4L · 56.5% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.5% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
28%
14W–36L · 39.6% of games
8.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 45.7% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
165 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
129 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
80 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams