← Search

Elena Escamilla

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orlando, FL
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 42W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history92 matches
L
2026-05-02 · Orange/Bottinelli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Krueger championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · Orange/Bottinelli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carolina Wallis-Crespo
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · Orange/Bottinelli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Krueger
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-01 · Florida/Becket/55 & Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Susan Wright championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-18 · Sanlando-Allen · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marianna Coelho
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-04 · Sanlando-Allen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Svaetichin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-05 · Florida/Becket/55 & Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Susan Wright championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
Mary Turnes / Ann Carlson
2024-05-04 · Florida/Becket/55 & Over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gail Gibson championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-02-24 · Florida/Becket/55 & Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Janet Lower
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-09 · Florida/Becket/55 & Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gail Gibson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-01-20 · Florida/Becket/55 & Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gail Gibson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-06-09 · Lake Cane-Peele · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Davis
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
59.1%
26W–18L · 50.8% of games
8.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 46.8% of games
9.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 43% of games
9.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.5% of games
9.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams