← Search

Michael Sorrentino

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Houston, TX
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 10W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history50 matches
W
2026-04-25 · Wideman 4.0-Woodlands · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darrel Thorson
loading the estimate
2-2
L
2026-04-11 · Wideman 4.0-Woodlands · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Wooten
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · Wideman 4.0-Woodlands · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Wooten
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-04 · Wideman 4.0-Woodlands · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darrel Thorson
loading the estimate
2-2
L
2026-03-21 · Wideman 4.0-Woodlands · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Sawaya
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-17 · HFTC - Wideman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Campbell
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Abokhair
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-04-11 · Wideman-Double Trouble 9.0-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Ryan
loading the estimate
0-6
L
2024-04-06 · Wideman-Double Trouble 9.0-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dan Forlenza
loading the estimate
2-8
W
2024-04-06 · Wideman-Double Trouble 9.0-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Ryan
loading the estimate
3-1
L
2024-03-30 · Wideman-Double Trouble 9.0-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chad Johnson
loading the estimate
2-8
W
2024-03-30 · Wideman-Double Trouble 9.0-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chad Johnson
loading the estimate
0-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–10L · 35.8% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.6% of games
9.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 19.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer