← Search

Rebekah Herrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 131W–88L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history219 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Celestain/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petrina Holloway
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-22 · Celestain/LF/40&over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tonya Sanders
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-01 · Celestain/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petrina Holloway
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-24 · Celestain/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Hoster
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-16 · Celestain/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petrina Holloway
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Mullenix championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Mullenix championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Noyes
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Cook
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
Default
2026-04-19 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Ames
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Ames
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · Tulsa/Culver/LF/ 65s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Gray
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.4% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.8%
60W–34L · 56.1% of games
4.0
17.2%
5W–24L · 38.5% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
79.1%
34W–9L · 61.1% of games
8.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 38.9% of games
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
35 matches
#1 Singles
8%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer