← Search

Dimitri Kaufman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenwood Village, CO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 26W–45L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history71 matches
L
2026-10-13 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-29 · LTFC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Ingle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-01 · LTFC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Forti
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-07-09 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Reed
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-05 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barney
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-31 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Reed
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-29 · GAC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barney
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-05-22 · GAC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Reed
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-05-17 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Reed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-05-15 · GAC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barney
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-05-12 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Reed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-08 · GAC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barney
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 54.9% of games
4.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 42.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.1% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 24% of the time
Singles
24%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal