← Search

Greg Aigner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Golden, CO
3.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
95 matches · 37W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history95 matches
L
2026-07-30 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathaniel Strout
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Adams
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gillespie
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Adams
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Gall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · NJ NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Gall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ursula Hamel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ursula Hamel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-05 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with April Kobayashi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-17 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Gardiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-07-27 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Gall mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-20 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Gardiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
37.5%
15W–25L · 48.1% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.8% of games
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 34.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams