← Search

Marie-France Isabelle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 7W–38L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history45 matches
L
2026-03-31 · JCC- 70's · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Marshburn
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-17 · JCC- 70's · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Marshburn
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-26 · JCC- 70's · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Nelsen
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
Karen Erickson / Terry Lemberg-Finn
2025-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Marshburn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Whitehorn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Kallal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Palley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca LaMear
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Kelp-Lenane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris McDougal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
L
2023-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ana Woodmansee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Hudson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
16.7%
7W–35L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King