← Search

Mark Holgerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sacramento, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 24W–52L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history76 matches
L
2024-04-09 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Stephens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-04 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Seyler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-03-20 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kuhl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
L
2024-03-14 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kuhl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-28 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Stephens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-22 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Seyler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-21 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kuhl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-14 · GOLD RIVER RC 65AM7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kuhl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-02 · GOLD RIVER RC S70M8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phillip Allman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-27 · GOLD RIVER RC S70M8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phillip Allman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-20 · GOLD RIVER RC S70M8.0B · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Rock
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-13 · GOLD RIVER RC S70M8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phillip Allman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 55% of games
7.0
0%
0W–9L · 29% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
19.2%
5W–21L · 38.6% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe