← Search

Eric Seymour

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, SC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 28W–66L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history94 matches
L
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Belcher-Cook mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Belcher-Cook mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-15 · LATA40/Coyle/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Bowens mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Pearson-Graves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-24 · LATA40/Coyle/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Bowens mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-22 · LATA40/Coyle/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Batina Feaster mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-17 · LATA40/Coyle/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Coyle mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Bowens mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Belcher-Cook mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Venetta Jagan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-13 · LATA40/Coyle/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Coyle mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-13 · LATA55/Redick/SSP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Belcher-Cook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 43.2% of games
4.0
9.7%
3W–28L · 33% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 59.7% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40% of games
3.5mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.3% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe