← Search

William Edwards

— year-end
30 matches · 16W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add William Edwards to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Baggett/Martin DAY · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Trimp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Ri.Pfeiffer55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Clay Garst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · Baggett/Martin DAY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Trimp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
David Li / Andrew Capella
2026-05-04 · elrod/ransome · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Jurgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
Ed Vogelsong / David Li
2026-05-01 · elrod/ransome · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barry Dempsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · elrod/ransome · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Trimp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Baggett/Thompson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · elrod/ransome · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Paul Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Baggett/Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-12 · Baggett/Thompson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-11 · elrod/ransome · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Jurgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-08 · Gr.Cooper65A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dayn Harum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.8% of games
9.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#3 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert