← Search

Britt Peeples

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Flowery Branch, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 107W–41L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history148 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Deer Lake (Michael Dooley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Montgomery
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Hall
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-08 · Deer Lake (Michael Dooley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Meier
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Deer Lake (Michael Dooley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt King
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · Deer Lake (Michael Dooley)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hrishi Talwar
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-05 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quang Dinh
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catalin Uta
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradley Gober
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with An Le
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-31 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with An Le
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Meier championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-15 · Riverbrooke (Quinn Aguirre)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Meier
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
74.3%
84W–29L · 56.4% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 43.9% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova