← Search

Brett Shrewsbury

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Centennial, CO
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 36W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history64 matches
L
2026-05-28 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · LTFC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jerry Seay
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Wohl
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-23 · LTFC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Zubowicz
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Wohl
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-24 · HV SILVER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meghan Balderston mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-08-10 · HV SILVER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Courtney Fabrizio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-27 · LTFC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Zubowicz
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-06-13 · LTFC NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-16 · LTFC BRONZE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Sagel
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-06 · LTFC BRONZE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Sagel
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-09-03 · LTFC GREY · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Wohl
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 60.8% of games
4.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Singles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams