← Search

Bradley Watkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, SC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 17W–14L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
W
2026-03-14 · CTL (A) 9.0M 55 & Over (Eaker) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Hook
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · CTL (A) 9.0M 55 & Over (Eaker) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Hook
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · CTL40/EAKER/CTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jim Hinson
loading the estimate
0-4
W
2024-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Hook
loading the estimate
1-0
L
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Shaw
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Fortson
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Junis
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Hook
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Hook
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2022-08-13 · LATA55/WESCOTT/SSP · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Gardiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2022-08-06 · LATA55/WESCOTT/SSP · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Gardiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-07-30 · LATA55/WESCOTT/SSP · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rob Holleman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.9% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 55.4% of games
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova