← Search

Julie Oreck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Orleans, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 91W–141L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history232 matches
L
2026-10-12 · BABIN/40/6.5/CWD/GACC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with EVE KAZIK
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-30 · Thibodaux/6.5/55/CWD/Aud · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-28 · BABIN/40/6.5/CWD/GACC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Owens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-19 · New Orleans - Janeski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Chauvin
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-19 · New Orleans - Janeski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bam Gressett
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-18 · New Orleans - Janeski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bam Gressett
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Osborne/55/3.0/Mixed/CP · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frank Bommarito mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-31 · Babin/40+/3.5/NOD/GACC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Russo
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Oreck/55/3.0/NOD/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with EVE KAZIK
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-16 · Kazik/40+/3.0/NOD/GACC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donielle Osborn
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-11 · Oreck/55/3.0/NOD/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with EVE KAZIK
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · Kazik/40+/3.0/NOD/GACC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Clayton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams128 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
36.4%
32W–56L · 46.1% of games
3.5
30.4%
14W–32L · 38.5% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.1% of games
6.5
40.4%
21W–31L · 43.6% of games
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.8% of games
3.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
56 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert