← Search

David Pleet

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springfield, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 11W–7L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history18 matches
W
2026-06-14 · LTC:Ballboys 55:Friguglietti/Nicoletta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Morizio
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-14 · LTC:Ballboys 55:Friguglietti/Nicoletta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Friguglietti
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-5
W
2025-08-16 · LTC:Sr. Ballboys:Friguglietti/Nicoletta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Getler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · LTC:Sr. Ballboys:Friguglietti/Nicoletta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Callaghan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-07-27 · LTC:Sr. Ballboys:Friguglietti/Nicoletta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Getler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-12 · LTC:Sr. Ballboys:Friguglietti/Nicoletta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Mochak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-07-09 · SCC:Merrill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Gelling
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
2022-06-25 · SCC:Merrill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Gelling
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-06-11 · SCC:Merrill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Fournier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2020-02-08 · Enfield: McManus-Bishop · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Kollias
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2019-12-14 · Enfield: McManus-Bishop · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Piersanti
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2019-10-19 · Enfield: McManus-Bishop · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Kollias
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
7.0
100%
9W–0L · 67.3% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 61% of the time
#2 Doubles
61%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer