← Search

Lesa Rowe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FAIRHOPE, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 88W–113L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history201 matches
L
2026-10-17 · GS - Bryant · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katharine Mclemore
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-06 · GS - Bryant · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Scarborough
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-29 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hurley
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-22 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hurley
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-18 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hurley
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · GS - Bryant · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Trish Kington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · GS - Bryant · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Whitehead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · GS - Bryant · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Annecchiarico
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · GS - Bryant · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debbie Fulmer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janet Hurley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Sandefur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Sandefur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.9% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
43.9%
50W–64L · 49.2% of games
4.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 36.9% of games
6.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 51.6% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova