← Search

Candice Gast Wilcox

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tyler, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 36W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history63 matches
L
2026-03-22 · Green/ Lewis - Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Murphy
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-02-24 · Huskey -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn von Eschenbach
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · Green/ Lewis - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yumiko Green
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-12 · Huskey -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone James
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-06 · Huskey -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Mallory
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-22 · Huskey -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone James
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-20 · Huskey -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone James
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-01-13 · Huskey -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone James
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-13 · Green -Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Rogers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-08-23 · Green -Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Schnittker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-16 · Green -Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-09 · Green -Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Rogers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 56.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52%
13W–12L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams