Paula Schwartz
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
152 matches · 85W–67L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history152 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2024
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM 8.0W Beavis-HP
4.0W HP-Emmons
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM 8.0 ELG - Miller
NNM 8.0 TCA - Goradia
NNM 8.0W JC - Letz
NNM 4.0W HP - Swanson
NNM 4.0W Lobo Club - Brunacini-Jones
NNM 4.5W HP - Hollowell
NNM 8.0MX JC - Rising
NNM 8.0W HP - Schwartz
NNM TriW JC - Towery
NNM/Rising/55& Over Mixed/8.0
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM 4.0W HP - Jones
NNM 4.5W HP - Hollowell
NNM 4.5W HP - Hollowell
NNM 8.0W HP - Brown
NNM TriW JC - Towery
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM4.0W40_Jones_HP
NNM4.5W40_Carman_JC
NNM4.0W18_Jones_HP
NNM4.0W40_Ennis_HP
NNM4.5W18_Emmons_HP
NNM4.5W40_Emmons_HP
NNM7.0W55_Goldstein_JC
NNM8.0W55_Brennen_HP
NNM8.0X18_Stewart_HP
NNM8.0X40_Carman_JC
NNM9.0X40_Baca_VR
NNMTriW_Carman_JC
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
71%
49W–20L · 57.9% of games
4.5
21.9%
7W–25L · 40.6% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
15W–10L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.