← Search

Jennifer Adkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 29W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history53 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Burnett/Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberley Michener
loading the estimate
3-1
L
2026-07-22 · Burnett/Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Brooking
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Burnett/Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberley Michener
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Burnett/Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Longacre
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · Burnett/Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Longacre
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · Burnett/Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Gunter
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-14 · Burnett/Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Grim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-3
W
2024-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phoebe Hodge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginni Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2024-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberley Michener
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phoebe Hodge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2023-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberley Michener
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 71% of games
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 45.6% of games
7.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Singles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert