← Search

Alicia Sikes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Quakertown, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 118W–120L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history238 matches
W
2026-10-17 · Fantastic Cats · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheena Hauser
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · Fantastic Cats · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Quigley
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bernabeo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanne Milburn
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bernabeo
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · UMLY 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Krane
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-5
W
2026-07-15 · UMLY 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Krane
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · No Love Lost · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jones
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · Smashing Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wai Chang
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · No Love Lost · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jones
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 29.2% of games
4.0
51.9%
84W–78L · 51% of games
4.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 38.8% of games
8.0
63.6%
28W–16L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
33 matches
#1 Singles
12%
28 matches
Singles
6%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova