← Search

Rodney Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 5W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
L
2026-06-23 · Narvaez · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Alschlager
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Narvaez · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Merle Bryan
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-07-24 · Smith-Rust Runners · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randall Istre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-06-12 · Smith-Rust Runners · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randall Istre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-05-29 · Smith-Rust Runners · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Merle Bryan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-22 · Smith-Rust Runners · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randall Istre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2023-07-12 · Combs- Rust Runners 8.0 65+ S23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Mahoney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-28 · Combs- Rust Runners 8.0 65+ S23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Spilseth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-07 · Combs- Rust Runners 8.0 65+ S23 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Warren Bracke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-24 · Combs- Rust Runners 8.0 65+ S23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Mahoney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-17 · Combs- Rust Runners 8.0 65+ S23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Combs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-29 · Combs - Rust Runners 2022 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Jerdee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
19.2%
5W–21L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams