← Search

Marshal Schlesinger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FARMINGTON, CT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-04-18 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Parente · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Parente · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Magee
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-24 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Parente · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-08 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Parente · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Goodwin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-11 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Parente · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-27 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Parente · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Taylor Webster
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-22 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Hintz/ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Ratcliffe
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-03-02 · BSF:Polhamus/Turekian · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marian Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-12-21 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Hintz/ · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alvaro Bonaguro
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-12-07 · BSF:Big Sky Farmington:Hintz/ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Ratcliffe
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2023-10-29 · BSF:Deuces Wild:Polhamus/Turekian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Neville mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-10-08 · BSF:Deuces Wild:Polhamus/Turekian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Loughman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#2 Singles
17%
2 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams