← Search

Tim Metzger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New York, NY
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 9W–16L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history25 matches
W
2025-09-06 · BOUS:BERKSHIRE BEARS:Ballen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elisa Mishory mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-19 · BOUS:BERKSHIRE BEARS:Ballen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adriene Barmann mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-25 · BWAC:Bosquet Bears:Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Rawitz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2022-07-18 · BWAC:Bosquet Bears:Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Rawitz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-20 · BWAC:Bosquet Bears:Goldberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arnold Goldberg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-02-19 · Halpern/Schaffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Eichenbaum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2020-02-03 · Halpern/Schaffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Eichenbaum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2020-01-14 · Silvestry/Cohn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Halpern
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2020-01-05 · Silvestry/Cohn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Terk
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2019-12-17 · Halpern/Schaffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2019-12-10 · Halpern/Schaffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2019-11-17 · Silvestry · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Silvestry
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.5% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova