Michelle Jacobs
136 matches · 74W–62L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Michelle Jacobs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history136 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Kim Sims / Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Kathleen Biggs / Christina Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.8%
50W–35L · 56.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 42% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games
6.5
56%
14W–11L · 52.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
58 matches
#1 Singles
31%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.