← Search

JoAnn Pawid

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hayward, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 91W–93L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history184 matches
L
2026-10-31 · BAY TREES PK 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Manish Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-18 · LANEY TA/MERVYN MORRIS PK CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Lowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-15 · BAY TREES PK CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ella Hurd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · BAY TREES PK 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Duane Duchscherer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-09 · BAY TREES PK CW6.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ella Hurd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Leong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-26 · LANEY TA/MERVYN MORRIS PK CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Bahm
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · LANEY TA/MERVYN MORRIS PK CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Hauck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-04 · BAY TREES PK CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ella Hurd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · LANEY TA/MERVYN MORRIS PK CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Gee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · BAY TREES PK 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.4% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 38.8% of games
6.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.4% of games
6.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.1% of games
7.0
48.6%
18W–19L · 52.5% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.2% of games
6.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.5%
20W–23L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova