← Search

Judy Haley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Guilford, CT
— year-end
23 matches · 9W–14L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history23 matches
L
2024-12-16 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-12-09 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-04 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2023-10-31 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maira Rieger
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-17 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Roberts
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-12-10 · GF:Shoreline Storm:Rieger/Baumgaertner · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-13 · GF:Shoreline Storm:Rieger · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2022-02-26 · GF:Swings and Mrs.:Cappetta · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristine Larson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-02-06 · GF:Swings and Mrs.:Cappetta · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-01-30 · GF:Shoreline Storm:Rieger · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2021-12-19 · GF:Shoreline Storm:Rieger · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Boyd
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2021-06-16 · GF:New Vintage:Tabar/Rieger · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Baumgaertner
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
7W–7L · 47.2% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe