← Search

Patti Keck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Santa Barbara, CA
— year-end
44 matches · 19W–25L · seasons 2019–2021
Match history44 matches
L
2020-03-08 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2020-03-07 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christy Foreman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2020-03-01 · SB-LLW - KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rowena Buist
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2020-02-29 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Mejia-Holdsworth
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2020-02-23 · SB-LLW - KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rowena Buist
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-02-16 · SB-LLW - KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Dall'Armi
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2020-02-15 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexis Davis
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2020-02-09 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela McCampbell
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2020-02-01 · SFV The Joy of Sets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Soto
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2020-01-25 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Sanford-Roberts
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2020-01-18 · SFV The Joy of Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Soto
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2020-01-11 · V - LLW Libbey Park-Patti Keck · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela McCampbell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
Teams15 teams · 2019–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 45.7% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova