← Search

Michael Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 25W–41L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history66 matches
L
2025-06-09 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Brooks/Hejeebu-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan McCloskey
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Brooks/Hejeebu-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Brooks
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-05-19 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Brooks/Hejeebu-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Haxton
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-23 · NWO 65&Over 7.0 Men MCCLOSKEY-SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Haxton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-09-04 · NWO 65&Over 7.0 Men MCCLOSKEY-SVC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Omar Salem
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-08-28 · NWO 65&Over 7.0 Men MCCLOSKEY-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Gibbons
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-08-08 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Nixon -TTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Cameron
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-27 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Nixon -TTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Gray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-06 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Nixon -TTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Li
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-19 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Eilert/Stegman PTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Busselle
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-13 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Swartzbeck-PTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Klein
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-29 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Swartzbeck-PTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Klein
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 42.9% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.1% of games
8.0
27.3%
6W–16L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams