← Search

David Goff

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 4W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-04-16 · Ke.DeHaven65A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Patton
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-19 · Ke.DeHaven65A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Weis
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-30 · K.DeHaven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Dehaven
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-03-23 · K.DeHaven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Thompson
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-16 · K.DeHaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Asher
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-09 · K.DeHaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dale Siler
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-02 · K.DeHaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dale Siler
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-07-12 · WWeis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Goff mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2022-07-12 · WWeis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hobson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5
W
2022-06-21 · WWeis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Hobson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-04-20 · IRLedbetter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Ledbetter
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-23 · IRLedbetter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Ledbetter
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 37.5% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer