← Search

Nina Segawa

Hilo, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 89W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nina Segawa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Hilo Gurlz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Tatsuno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Kari Wicklund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Teresa Doak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Susan Webber / Michelle Smith
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kari Wicklund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kari Wicklund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · Hilo Gurlz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Tatsuno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-05 · Hilo Gurlz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jo Ann Ishida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · On Court Chaos · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheri Kinoshita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · On Court Chaos · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Norine Parish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · On Court Chaos · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Norine Parish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · On Court Chaos · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheri Kinoshita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · Happy Feet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Horike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 55.6% of games
7.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 65% of games
8.0
92.3%
24W–2L · 70.1% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer