← Search

Carven Albanese

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilton, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 58W–43L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history101 matches
L
2026-08-22 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carola Cazenave championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-01 · 4S:Perfectly Matched:Giff/Rose · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Murdock
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Rinaldi
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · 4S: Aged to Perfection: Moss/Goehringer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Moss
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · 4S:Perfectly Matched:Giff/Rose · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Gaspar
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Lucas
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · 4S: Aged to Perfection: Moss/Goehringer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Rinaldi
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · 4S: Aged to Perfection: Moss/Goehringer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Goehringer
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
Default
2026-06-06 · 4S:Perfectly Matched:Giff/Rose · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Conklin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · 4S: Aged to Perfection: Moss/Goehringer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Lucas
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5
L
2025-12-07 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.3%
35W–25L · 51.9% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.4% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.7% of games
7.0
64%
16W–9L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe