← Search

Linda Hartnett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ambler, PA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 6W–42L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history48 matches
L
2026-08-21 · The Sunsetters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Jarvis
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-07 · The Sunsetters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Jarvis
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · The Sunsetters · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Jarvis
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-24 · The Sunsetters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Harriet Breuninger
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-10 · The Sunsetters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bev Michel
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-29 · Slam Bam Thank You Ma'am · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bev Michel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · Slam Bam Thank You Ma'am · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Burke
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-08-27 · Tequila Sunrise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Tighe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-08-20 · Tequila Sunrise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Tighe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Madhuri Malkani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-16 · The Sunsetters · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marianne Cross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-09 · Tequila Sunrise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Tighe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 34% of games
6.0
10%
1W–9L · 35.1% of games
7.0
5%
1W–19L · 29.4% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer