← Search

Diane Crone

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walled Lake, MI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 24W–35L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history59 matches
W
2024-08-21 · 2SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS AD55&O WED 60 AMW SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-08-07 · 2SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS AD55&O WED 60 AMW SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Bailey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2024-08-02 · 2FAC-CRONE AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Tseng
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-07-26 · 2FAC-CRONE AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Hogan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-12 · 2FAC-CRONE AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheela Karwande
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-06-26 · 2SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS AD55&O WED 60 AMW SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2024-06-19 · 2SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS AD55&O WED 60 AMW SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Wisner-Aigeltinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-07 · 2FAC-CRONE AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheela Karwande
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-08-25 · 1FAC-CRONE AD65&O 60W FRI SEM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Charron
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-02 · 3SCWB-CRONE AD55&O 60DW WED SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherrie Fergusson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-28 · 1FAC-CRONE AD65&O 60W FRI SEM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Gasparian
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-19 · 3SCWB-CRONE AD55&O 60DW WED SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherrie Fergusson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2025
2FAC-MIDDLEBROOKS 60DW FRI 65&O SEM
2025 bSEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN FRI AM SEM · 65+
2025
4SCWB-CRONE 60DW WE 55&O SEM F1
2025 bSEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM · 55+
2025
2FAC-CRONE AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM
2024 SEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN FRI AM SEM · 65+
2024
2SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS AD55&O WED 60 AMW SEM F1
2024 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM · 55+
2024
1FAC-CRONE AD65&O 60W FRI SEM
2023 SEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN FRI AM SEM · 65+
2023
3SCWB-CRONE AD55&O 60DW WED SEM F1
2023 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM · 55+
2023
5SCWB-CRONE 60DW 55&O AD WED SEM
2022 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM · 55+
2022
SEM/Mathis/A65&O 6.0W
2022 SEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN FRI AM SEM · 65+
2022
2.5 day Middlebrooks team
zz2021 Registration Holding Pens · z2021 Holding Cell-female
2021
2SCWB-MATHIS 6.0W 65&O FRI SEM
2021 SEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN FRI AM SEM · 65+
2021
2SCWB-MILLER 30DW 40&O AD MON SEM
2021 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN MON AM SEM · 40+
2021
4SCWB-STREET 30NW 40&O AD TUES SEM F3
2021 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM · 40+
2021
5SCWB-WINER 60DW 55&O AD WED SEM
2021 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM · 55+
2021
2FAC-STREET 30nw 40 tues sem F2
2020 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM - league is updated · 40+
2020
5SCWB-MILLER 30dw 40 mon sem
2020 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN MON AM SEM-league is updated · 40+
2020
SCWB-ANSTETT 60w 65 fri sem
2020 SEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN FRI AM SEM · 65+
2020
drop SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS 25dw 18 thur sem F
2020 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 2.5 WOMEN THUR AM SEM 0 teams in league · 18+
2020
1SCWB-ARMIAK 30DW 40 MON SEM
2019 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN MON AM SEM · 40+
2019
2SCWB-MATHIS 60DW 55 WED SEM F1
2019 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM · 55+
2019
4FAC-STREET 30NW 40 TUES SEM F5
2019 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM · 40+
2019
4SCWB-MIDDLEBROOKS 55 combo women SEM F2
2019 aSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 55 COMBO SEM
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
5.9%
1W–16L · 29.1% of games
6.0
55%
22W–18L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
44%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer