← Search

Bruce Shields

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SALINE, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 35W–87L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-02 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tae-Hwa Chun championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tae-Hwa Chun
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McKenzie
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Tinney
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Quint
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thiru Gundala
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Grant
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Beaver
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milo Russell
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-26 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Beaver
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-07-29 · 3HV-SHIELDS 70M TU 55&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Beaver
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-22 · 3HV-SHIELDS 70M TU 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Belcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
32%
8W–17L · 43.5% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 28.2% of games
7.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 42.3% of games
7.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 35.3% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
31%
9W–20L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
18 matches
Singles
15%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe