← Search

Christen Harsha

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Washington, DC
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
621 matches · 483W–138L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history621 matches
W
2026-09-20 · Bullman - BullTekD · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Derek Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-13 · Team 3 Wendy Carvajal · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kelly Domson
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-11 · Team 3 Wendy Carvajal · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Stephanie Evans
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-10 · Bullman - BullTekD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Hill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · Bullman - BullTekD · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Hill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · Team 3 Wendy Carvajal · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Danielle Desfosses
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · Team 3 Wendy Carvajal · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Danielle Desfosses
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Team 3 Wendy Carvajal · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Emma Shine
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · Team 3 Wendy Carvajal · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Danielle Desfosses
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-2
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alan Chaney mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Zoltek mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · McCann · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erika Trost
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams146 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
0.0
100%
8W–0L · 70.2% of games
4.0
95.2%
100W–5L · 80.5% of games
4.5
92.1%
58W–5L · 70.2% of games
5.0
25.6%
10W–29L · 40.9% of games
7.5
86.7%
26W–4L · 70.6% of games
8.5
90%
18W–2L · 69.3% of games
9.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.3% of games
0.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.5% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34.8% of games
4.0mixed
90.9%
20W–2L · 69.1% of games
4.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 65.9% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 67.4% of games
7.5mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 77.3% of games
8.0mixed
84.1%
53W–10L · 62.5% of games
8.5mixed
83.3%
50W–10L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
65.6%
84W–44L · 55.8% of games
9.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
236 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
167 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
111 matches
#1 Singles
14%
85 matches
#2 Singles
2%
12 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe