← Search

Sheryl Kendrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Abilene, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 5W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-03-31 · 7.0 Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Everett
loading the estimate
3-8
L
2026-03-24 · 7.0 Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Everett
loading the estimate
4-8
L
2026-03-17 · 7.0 Team · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Everett
loading the estimate
3-8
L
2026-03-10 · 7.0 Team · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Everett
loading the estimate
0-8
L
2026-03-03 · 7.0 Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Everett
loading the estimate
5-8
L
2025-03-25 · 7.0 Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cassie Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-8
L
2025-03-20 · 7.0 Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cassie Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2025-03-18 · 7.0 Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cassie Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2025-03-13 · 7.0 Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cassie Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-8
L
2025-03-11 · 7.0 Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cassie Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-8
L
2024-05-01 · 3.5 Team 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shellie Smyser
loading the estimate
3-8
L
2024-04-28 · 3.5 Team 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shellie Smyser
loading the estimate
2-8
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–16L · 25.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe