← Search

Kathryn Geiger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bedford Hills, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 5W–5L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history10 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Grand Slam - 18+ 4.5 W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · Grand Slam - 18+ 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jean Lipman
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Grand Slam - 18+ 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Moskow
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Grand Slam - 18+ 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danika Altman
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-10 · Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misun Kim
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-05-07 · Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hongyu Root
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-01 · Saw Mill Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilma Sanchez
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2019-12-07 · Saw Mill: Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Lau mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2019-11-09 · Saw Mill: Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Lau mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-11-02 · Saw Mill: Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Lau mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 32.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer