Matthew Neeld
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
19 matches · 13W–6L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history19 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.3% of games
10.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.5% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.