← Search

Leah Surles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 46W–67L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history113 matches
L
2026-10-28 · LTP DI- Brinson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Coursey
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-25 · Sunday Funday · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Arena
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-21 · LTP DI- Brinson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Grimmer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-20 · Sunday Funday · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rosemarie Coakley
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · LCTA18/Frailey/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Kennelly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · LCTA18/Frailey/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maryanne Burkholder
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · LCTA18/Frailey/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashli Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · LCTA18/Frailey/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Angela Woolridge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · LCTA40/Brinson/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Janet Machado
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · LCTA40/Roman/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Jesberger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · LCTA55/Coursey/LTPDI · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ginger Selby
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · LCTA40/Roman/LTPDI · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Kennelly
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
39.5%
32W–49L · 44% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal